PROS & CONS
What are the best aspects of this product?
We were on the long run looking for a tool which can really improve the performance of our websites. We left this problem in the past with New Relic, and we have great servers to prove that it is actually working. I’ve honestly never used a better tool for the purpose!
Our company is an admirer of their detail accuracy, knowing as much as the timeline of a triggered webpage (we know exactly how much it takes for data to be presented to users, and we can interpret every delay accurately). The ultimate result is full exposure of dysfunctional codes and queries, and you won’t be sitting on the fence too long before asking a dev team to deal with it. I must say I’d be lost without these New Relic’s reports.
Obviously, code optimization doesn’t carry the can for every webpage’s malicious performance, but in case it does we know it. That’s why we rely on New Relic so badly: the review features are the best they can get.
It really helps. It just does!
What aspects are problematic or could work better?
I was thinking about this, but nothing crossed my mind. I think all features work well. Maybe they should be more innovative in terms of availability, a mobile app or a Mac version, per se. The tool is so good that I think everyone should be able to track performance with it, wherever they are. I would really like those versions for myself.
What specific problems in your company were solved by this product?
The company reviews the performance of our websites, with different numbers of users accessing it simultaneously. We have a clear overview of the performance of our codes, and we fix dysfunctional ones almost immediately.
Are you a current user of this product?