Progress Telerik UI Reviews

Contols, features and attributes. Customer support

Not sure if integration is always very easy.

Accessibility and KB Navigation

The UI components and the effort that the team has put into it to create a valuable library to satisfy various requirements.

It took 48 hour to reply hour question regarding a product, but at the end it was worth it.

Various requirements exist to build a schedule component into a WPF application for a Client. Using Telerik saves us lots of time and complexity during development.

The progress telerik ui for the .net framework is full of features and easy-to-implement controls. The continuous evolution and addition of new features allow the development of high-quality applications quickly.

On the downside, if the existing controls do not support a needed feature, you have to either spend much time developing a custom approach or suggest an alternative solution to the customer or wait until the required feature is added to the desired control (if the Telerik development team chooses it).

By using ready-made and quickly implemented controls in all the available technologies, you can offer high-quality services for paying less. Because Telerik develops the controls to an enterprise-level standard, and you can access it with just a tiny amount of money.

As software editor we prefer to relay on stable and professionnal frameworks eo insure customers of valuable exeperience

Not that much, Telerik made efforts for documentation

User experience, reliable functional components.

Uniform framework on our ERPs

What I found most useful from Telerik are the grid controls, as well as the various drop-down controls (such as the tree drop-down). This has allowed us to massively accelerate our UI development to provide consistent experience, and eliminated boiler-plate code that goes into common functions such as filtering, paging, column ordering. The Tree drop down control shows hierarchical data and provides a built-in search function.

There are some down-sides, which if you are doing something that is outside the examples provided by Telerik on the demo site, then the documentation is a little lacking as it doesn't always explain what is happening behind the scenes on the controls, and why you need to set a particular property, or request data from a particular function. We have also had issues using the Report viewer for Telerik due to intranet restrictions even with having a local to the network content delivery applet.

The greatest business problem being solved is the speed at which data is being served up to the user in the User Interface. The use of the Telerik controls, once we mastered the controls learning curve has cut our UI development time in half.

I really liked the stability of the tools and particularly the effectiveness of the support. It was more than excellent. I'm currently on a free trial and planning to purchase a license.

Nothing so far. Don't have much experience with it. I did two projects: Blazor Server and Wasm.

Better tools than MudBlazor and Radzen (gotta say they are fine but...)

Excellent components with plenty of flexibility and scope. Their support team is fantastic and quickly answers support requests with accurate responses, examples or pointers.

I have not found anything that I would say I "dislike.".

They are solving a charting solution to aid in diagnosing machine failures.

When they work, they can save a lot of time.

When they don't work, it is hard to figure out why.

Fairly complete coverage of UI elements. Responsive support team.

We need to provide rich UI for our customers and don't have time to learn and experiment with every new technology. I like to focus on the business requirements instead of the subtleties of CSS, or JavaScript.

Their software makes me think. i.e. sometimes one needs to look for the help topic that solves the technique question. So what? As a developer, you can find the answer to things some people do not even have a question for! :)

Hmmmmmm .... We are a small company. Could there not be a community version of the software we could get to market with? We all need to eat and pay overhead type bills while we develop, right?

We solve problems in our communities as people working in our communities.

We, within the tech industry, often find out about things people have no knowledge of in other trades. And we solve them without the need for thanks because we are good people on the whole.

The Support and really qualified Support people.

Dont really dislike, but Telerik Reporting could need some improvements (e.g. real HTML, some Fixes for Desktop-Designer)

Our whole Software (ERP, CRM, Transport Management) uses Telerik on all edges, so Telerik is a huge benefit for us.