Altair Hypermesh Reviews

The way how easy is to use it, the idea of making mesh independent of geometry is brilliant, maybe complicated GUI but in general easy to learn, and graphic performance

sometimes there are bugs in new releases, database is crashing from time to time with complicated models, I'm not convinced about being forced to use a new GUI in the future, and new versions are consuming a lot of ram memory. Price is also a bit to high, in my opinion, Altair is trying to use its "monopolistic" position and force high prices

The fastest preprocessor I know in compare to Patran (sic!), Apex, Ansys or Abaqus CAE, only that one is able to be fast enough to fit in present times performance expectations

User friendly and it will support to most of the analysis softwares. Easy to create fe mesh and easy to build Input model.

Mesh generation is littles slow and mesh flow is not accurate compare to comparators.

We prepare basic Fe models and input decks for simulation and for results verification we use hyperview.

Easy to mesh with basic understanding and to summarise the elements and nodes. Ease of implementation.

All good at the moment. Speed of solver inbuilt can be added.

Meshing and quality stress distribution for analysis.

Hypermesh helps me to reduce the degrees of freedom and help to do the FEA very easily

The slow lagging analsyis when the boundary conditions are large in numbers

It reduces the manual work reduce the degrees of freedom and we can fo it seperately and it is more productive

Very user friendly tool for FE Modelling as compared to its competitors. Altair also provides its own implicit and explicit solver for structural analysis along with Hypermesh.

The updated version of Hypermesh some issues for import of geometry. The time required to import the native CAD was less in old version of hypermesh as compared to the new version.

It has made users very simple for deck setup for almost all the solvers. It is not only time saving but also reduces the repetition of the work. Along with its updated versions new features are being added to the software.

It offers a user friendly platform for meshing which is simple and easy while offering all the features required for detailed modeling

There have been multiple versions of hypermesh released by altair recently which at times dont sinc with each other well.

It caters to the meshing requirements of different components for different types of analysis like FCG, Impact analysis, Linear, Non Linear, Modal analyses

Batch meshing,and the recently used dummy position tool is the best.

recent 21 version which has all the software in single click.

Few bucks are still there like sets associted with rigid element in LS dyna software is not working .

it is working fine in Nastran Solver.

Hypermesh is user friendly software and the we can do meshing easily which can be used for further simualtion.

Morphing tools are very easy to use and not available in other softwares

meshing options need to be upgraded for better mesh like in Ansa

All durability problems for trucks and cars

Ease of meshing; ability to use multiple solvers.

Menu can get cluttered; menu will disappear when you move pointer.

FEA of large complex structure; export of models to MBD solver for flex body analysis.

Altair hypermesh is used for modeling of Varied parts from different industries. It is best with good quality features for meshing. In Hypermesh There are many good features like keyboard settings, some scripts you can use, some shortcuts you can keep.

I didn't like the auto mesh features it didn't give proper results. It didn't have automatic features. but that features we get in ansa. we cant use Hypermesh tetra meshing. because ansa gives good results for tetra meshing.

I will suggest to everyone from every industry that hypermesh is best for meshing analysis of varies parts of or assemblies.

We are using Altair Hypermesh for meshing of various parts of automobile parts like Headlamp, Engine parts, Tail Lamps, Hood assembly, Door assembly, Carpet assembly, HVAC assembly, Bumper assembly, Door Trims, Exauhaust assembly. Then after meshing we are applying thickness, applying materials boundary conditions and Then we use the same assembly for analysis of car/vehicle for safety, the durability.