PATTSY Reviews

Intellectual Property specific, all rules updated frequently.

I see no downside, great customer service.

Pattsy Wave helps keep track of docketing dates for all of our Patent and Trademark matters. They constantly update their US and Foreign Country intellectual property law rulesets.

User friendly software that prevents loss of IP rights for my clients!

User input equals risky output. Gargabe in, garbage out.

PATTSY resolves complicated date calculations for projecting deadlines for IP rights. The reports provided are key to sucessful management.

Ease of use, seamless updates, and support.

That I dont have a demo account or install to show my students

This is the only IP Software to consider. All the rest are just settling for 2nd best. In IP Litigation, 2nd best is not acceptable.

I teach about the software at University as I'm a few years removed from administering PATTSY.

customizing reports; and the ability to use excel

International registration auto generated dates--especially DOU dates in Mexico

keeping up with the docket would be impossible otherwise

The interface is easy to use and the customer service is always the best

At the moment we are find that it meets our needs and there isn't anything we disklike

It helps with patents and it is so easy to use. Updates are always made to make sure everything is up to date.

Great for remote locations and on the road use. It helps with managing all our patent and trademark portfolios. Helps us practive more efficiently.

I have not found anything to dislike at this time. As this is webbased and continues to improve.

Look no further as this will definitly fulfill your needs if you are working on patents, trademarks or any other intellectual property matters.

It is easy to use and they are always making sure to keep it up to date. It helps with keeping up or trademark portfolios and other patents.

It is User Friendly, docket date automatically calculated from actions; relevant laws are updated quarterly, and the online documents on the system extremely useful and easily accessible

For Madrid filing, when Refusal Notice received from one country, it does not docket automatically; action notes are not shown on your screen - you have to move to the right to actually see your action notes

Maintaining accurate records

All of the data is located on one screen. Easy to navigate and intuitive.

The only minor thing that I dislike is that creating reports is not as intuitive.

The ability to link directly to the USPTO record from PATTSY WAVE makes life easier.

It is a single interface, everything you need is primarily on one screen, which makes it very convenient to navigate. I also, do appreciate their responsive customer support team.

I cannot think of anything that I particularly dislike about the application

I am on thew Support side myself, so I cannot definitively answer that question. However, it is an excellent tool for Patent and Trademark docketing.

Ease of Use- interface is easy to learn. I like that it has the capability to web validate some countries, but it is unfortunate that the ability to web validate all of the 'most filed in' countries are not available.

The Quick Search addition was great.

The reporting capabilities are great.

I like the built in 'soft' reminder feature- to minimize clutter on the dockets.

Trademarks- The Madrid Protocol setup is NOT ideal. There is no way to easily track the country reference numbers in the record- which is troublesome if you want to 'webcompare' or easily review the portfolio.

The software is not 'global' in the sense that there is not a specific Design Portal- although the rest of the world - outside of the USA- treats design applications more like trademarks.

It is frustrating, as one of the largest- if not the largest client of the software, that any customization or requests cost so much money. Specifically, when there are other products on the market, that offer customizations for less charge- to no charge.

Although I have little exposure to the 'back end' of PATTSY, my understanding is that it is scrambled- and difficult to interface with.

For TTAB/PTAB cases, there is no 'easy' way to docket the deadlines- and must be custom built- so much so, that the firm determined a different software would better suit the needs of the practice.

The firm standardized the IP practice to one software, which has enabled the group to be more uniform.